Thursday, April 3, 2014

Stunning Photos Explore Transgender Life In Mongolia

Article posted from Huffington Post, March 6, 2014:
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/06/alvaro-laiz_n_4905713.html?&ir=Gay%20Voices&utm_hp_ref=gay-voices
In Mongolia, the discrimination and violence against transgender peoples is so horrific many chose to live in the closet rather than face the persecution they may otherwise experience. In 2011 photographer Álvaro Laiz decided to capture their heartbreaking and devastatingly beautiful stories in his series "Transmongolian."
huff
"I decided to travel to Mongolia for several reasons," Laiz explained in an email to The Huffington Post. "It is located in the junction between three different worlds: Russia, Europe and China, while still retaining its identity. Mongolia is facing sudden changes after opening their borders to Western investment, but on the other hand, their nomadic and communist heritage still remains. It is this duplicity in their contemporary time that fascinated me."
"After doing research on nomadic tribes in Russia I came across the figure of Genghis Khan," Laiz continued. "He is considered the first leader who declared homosexuality illegal under death penalty in order to increase his population and face the Chinese army under the Song Dynasty. I was not looking for this kind of approach at the beginning, but I decided to take a look by myself when I noticed there was barely any information."
huff
After conducting some research, Laiz connected with a variety of male-to-female transgender individuals who allowed Laiz into their lives. From teachers and social workers to dancers and prostitutes, Laiz's photographic subjects reflect the radically diverse scope of Mongolia's transgender population. Laiz's photos depict people applying makeup, putting on jewelry, relaxing in private, showing the everyday rituals of Mongolian citizens who encounter tragic oppression in their home country.
"They cannot express themselves normally except in certain places," Laiz explained to Slate. "Your life becomes a scenario in which you are pretending to be someone else. Your job, your relatives become part of this performance, and little space is left to act as you would really want to be. It is insane."
Along with the grittier, documentary photographs, Laiz also snapped his subjects in traditional Mongolian queen costumes, further extending the series' themes of identity, costume and performance.
huff
"Being born in the right place or in the wrong place will lead you to be a different person," Laiz said, touching on the true arbitrary nature of who we are and who we are allowed to be. "What makes us they way we are? I photograph what I do not understand or what scares me. I can not think of nothing more terrifying than the idea of how a large part of our identity relies on facts and things we can not control and sometimes we do not even know that they exist."
"Transmongolian" is the first of a longterm project in which Laiz explores transgender people in nomadic societies across the globe. He has spent two years in the swamps of Venezuela documenting the acceptance of transgender individuals among the Warao society. See the ongoing project's stunning beginnings below.

alvaro

huff

huff
mong

Trans-Friendly Student Health Insurance Policies on Campuses Around the Country

Article posted from on Generation Progress (genprogress.org), July 15, 2013: 
Link: http://genprogress.org/voices/2013/07/15/20726/trans-friendly-student-health-insurance-policies-on-campuses-around-the-country/

You’ve seen this kind of disclaimer on most applications you’ve ever completed: So-and-so does not discriminate against any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, or national or ethnic origin. But you might or might not see a clause about sexual orientation. And you’ll rarely see one with protections for gender identity and expression.
Only about 10 percent of colleges and universities have trans-inclusive nondiscrimination policies—a disheartening statistic.
Trans students face a number of well-documented challenges when applying to, and ultimately attending, institutions of higher education. These problems range from gender-inclusive bathrooms and housing, to allowing for the use of preferred name and gender in college records, and even admission itself. Because in most cases a patient under the age of 18 must have parental consent and a diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria(formerly Gender Identity Disorder) from a medical professional, prospective college students have usually not transitioned before they apply to college and/or arrive on campus.
After years of advocacy against the labeling of trans individuals as mentally ill, the psychiatric diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, or DSM, reclassified “Gender Identity Disorder” as Gender Dysphoria. A Gender Dysphoria diagnosis is appropriate when an individual demonstrates a “marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender.” Classifying transgender individuals as mentally ill and “disordered” was a stigmatizing (and inaccurate) anachronism. Though the reclassification is a triumph, the use of the term “disorder” once provided strong justification for insurance companies to cover gender reassignment, better-called gender confirmation, surgeries. The argument that said surgeries are cosmetic, and not necessary, is unfortunately bolstered by the terminology shift away from disorder.
At the intersection of health policy and campus policy is the question of whether student health insurance plans cover transition-related hormone therapy, surgeries, and counseling. In 2007, a short six years ago, no college or university offered comprehensive health care benefits for trans students.
Today, over three dozen college and university student health plans cover gender confirmation surgery. Roughly an additional twenty-five cover surgery-related hormone therapy. And twenty universities cover hormone therapy, surgeries, or both for their employees. This is encouraging, but nowhere close to the 4,495degree-granting institutions of higher education counted in the U.S. as of 2010.
The percentage of colleges and universities that cover trans health needs also pales in comparison to the corporate realm: One-quarter of Fortune 500 companies cover gender confirmation surgeries, and an even larger percentage cover hormone replacement therapy.
For many but not all who identify as trans, hormone replacement therapy and gender confirmation surgeries are crucial to easing an often painful struggle with gender identity and presentation.
Noah Lupica, a rising sophomore a Brown University and a male-identified transgender student, told the Brown Daily Herald in February that for some, the surgeries are “life-saving.”

Recent Policy Changes

This past April, Tufts University extended student insurance coverage for hormone replacement therapies and surgeries for transgender students, as did Yale University, which had already offered that coverage to their employees. In May, The University of Illinois at Chicago, UIC, followed suit, although the UIC plan requires students to pay 30 percent of the cost.
In the same month, Princeton University extended gender confirmation surgery coverage to their employee health plan, and a parallel change to the student health plan may be in the works.
“While I applaud Princeton’s decision to extend coverage to transgender employees in this manner, it is a shame that the same inclusion has not been extended to students,” Princeton Pride Alliance co-president John Parvin told the Yale Daily News in May.
“Princeton is lagging behind many of its peer institutions despite having one of the largest university endowments and despite supposedly advocating for the welfare and inclusion of all its students,” Parvin said.
The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, Stanford, Brown, and Cornell Universities—typically considered Princeton’s peers—all cover gender confirmation surgeries for students.
Ironically, Princeton did cite parallel changes at peer institutions in their rationale: “Many of our peers are moving in this direction, and it seems to make sense for our population,” Michele Minter, the vice provost for institutional equity and diversity and chair of the transgender working group, said to The Daily Princetonian, an independent student publication at Princeton University.
“It seems like a very straightforward thing that would have minimal cost implications and have many potential benefits,” Minter said.
Now that Yale and Harvard Universities cover gender confirmation surgeries, it seems it can only be a matter of time before Princeton joins their ranks.
“This change is not a theoretical gesture,” Gabe Murchison, a rising senior at Yale University and member of the student group The Resource Alliance for Gender Equity, or RAGE, told Campus Progress. “The number of transgender graduate and undergraduate students will increase as it becomes possible for more people to change their gender during or before college, but a number of current students will be using this coverage, and there are many who graduated in years past and never had the chance.”

Young Trans People, the ACA, and Broader Trans Healthcare Concerns

“When a trans or queer student still has trouble finding a therapist, gynecologist, or primary care provider who is comfortable working with them, we still have a lot left to do,” Murchison stressed.
The Affordable Care Act will fund LGBT cultural competency trainings, which will hopefully address some of these issues. Furthermore, the ACA’s Patient Bill of Rights will preclude insurance companies from treating trans identity as a pre-existing condition, and the ACA will extend Title VII federal nondiscrimination protections to the healthcare field and to gender identity.
Hopefully these developments will also encourage less “elite” schools to implement trans-friendly healthcare policies, thereby reaching a broader range of students.

The Opposition

Opponents are concerned that covering gender confirmation surgery could lead to higher premiums or increased tuition. In the case of public schools, opponents further claim that tax dollars should not be used for medical procedures that not all taxpayers support.
In May, Duke responded to allegations that extending student insurance coverage to include gender confirmation surgery was directly responsible for a hike in tuition costs: “The addition of gender reassignment surgery represents 0.3 percent of the premium increase for student health insurance, or about $5.25 for the average student who utilizes the plan. This change has no impact on tuition, and no tuition or fees are used to subsidize the student health insurance plan.”
“This argument arises from a combination of prejudice against transgender people and a misunderstanding how health plans work,” Murchison said when asked about similar statements.
The same release also stated, “Through its practices and policies, Duke strives to be a welcoming and inclusive place for all individuals.”
“[RAGE’s] work is not limited to issues that affect transgender students in a narrow sense,” said Murchison. “Taking a broader view of student well-being helps us build stronger coalitions. For instance, improving all students’ access to mental health care is near the top of our agenda.”
On campuses without openly inclusive trans policies, a sympathetic healthcare provider may diagnose a student with “endocrine deficiency” or a similar affliction, so that their insurance will pay for hormone therapy. But relying on a sympathetic doctor in order to receive necessary medical attention is, to say the least, not ideal.

Why We Need Trans-Friendly Campus Health

Some argue that the percentage of transgender students is so low that it’s not necessary for campuses to have more inclusionary health policies. But this a subjective assessment; furthermore, reported percentages are likely inaccurate given that many individuals who have transitioned identify as their preferred gender, rather than as “transgender.”
“It’s common for students and administrators to speak and act as though the presence of trans, genderqueer and gender variant students were hypothetical,” Murchison said, “when in fact there are significant numbers of us at Yale right now.”
And some positive effects are less quantifiable. As UIC student trustee Ken Thomas said, “Diversity is not just a tool for recruiting. We embrace it and change lives with it.”

Out of the Game - Mixed Reactions to the Ban of Seven Female Iranian Footballers for ‘Gender Ambiguity’, 2/20/2014


Article Posted on International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commision website:
http://iglhrc.org/content/out-game-mixed-reactions-ban-seven-female-iranian-footballers-%E2%80%98gender-ambiguity%E2%80%99

IGLHRC believes that a vital part of our mission is supporting the work of activist organizations and allies by disseminating important information on human rights issues affecting LGBT communities worldwide. To this end we are posting this article by Small Media
On February 6, the Iranian Football Federation announced that it had imposed a ban on seven female football players as a result of their ‘ambiguous gender’. The head of the Football Federation, Ahmad Hashemian stated that: “This is not a case based on the short-term use of illegal drugs. [The players] have been banned as a result of gender ambiguity,” going on to say that “If these individuals are able to resolve their problems through [sex reassignment] surgery and the proper medical procedures, they will once again be permitted to take part in football and futsal games.”
Such a policy is emblematic of Iranian authorities’ stance on both women’s sport, and the politics of gender identity: any non-conventional expressions of gender identity are stamped out, and those individuals expressing such gender non-conformity are often subjected to mockery, bullying and exclusion by sports facilities, medical professionals, and members of society at large.
The Football Federation stated that the athletes disqualified included individuals born male who had not completed gender transitioning procedures, as well as others who were described as suffering from ‘sexual development disorders’. Further details were not provided.
In order to gain some insights into the sorts of responses ordinary Iranians had to this news story, we monitored the discussions taking place on the BBC Persian news commentary programme Nowbate Shoma, and social media sites, and present our findings to you now.
----------
Some users seemed to assume that the women footballers were excluded as a result of taking testosterone hormones, and expressed concern that the players in question were attempting to use illegal drugs in order to gain a competitive edge. Shirin from Tehran called into Nowbate Shoma with this message, stating that Iranian sportswomen have a tendency to suffer from psychological problems, and should be provided with counselling in order to maintain their femininity:
“I’ve been playing football for six years, and I’ve observed in a number of teams that some girls attempt to increase their strength through the use of testosterone hormones. I think that the football federation, instead of enforcing tough regulations against these girls, should bring psychologists to the teams to teach the sportswomen that there is no need to have a boyish appearance to continue playing such sports.”
----------
Though she did not discount the possibility of doping being a contributing factor in the ban, Ida from Sweden was more critical of the Football Federation’s ill-defined and irrational guidelines, which she warned could have an impact on any women whose appearance was deemed ‘unfeminine’ in the eyes of their coaches:
“Honestly, I am not 100% opposed to these rules - I’ve seen in Iran that some girls use male hormones, and it is not fair that they should play in the same matches as the other players. But such vague and generalised rules wrongly allow everyone with a boyish appearance to be filtered out from the teams.”
----------
The well-known Iranian sports journalist Mehdi Rostampour attempted to steer the conversation away from doping allegations, arguing that it was unlikely that the disqualified footballers were barred by the Football Federation for taking performance-enhancing drugs. Instead, he considered that the decisions were made as a result of officials’ ignorance and prejudice against those who do not conform to conventional gender expectations:
“Testosterone is one of the most consumed hormones in Iranian sport, and so is considered as a form of doping, unrelated to this formal categorisation of ‘sexual ambiguity’. But ‘boyish appearance’ is completely undefinable. In men’s sport also, some people will say that an athlete has a ‘girlish appearance’ - I think we should go move on from these sorts of issues nowadays.”
----------
This point was taken up by a caller, Mahshid from Tehran, who criticised the Football Federation for using vague, subjective rules to embarrass and discourage women from taking part in sport:
“The problem is in the ambiguity of Mr. Hashemian’s words. If consumption of testosterone is considered to be doping, then they should say clearly that these athletes have committed doping, and that the results of their drug tests were positive. But he has instead emphasized that none of these athletes failed a doping test, and that the issue was their ‘sexual ambiguity’! The impact of such rulings on women’s sport will be to discourage women and push them away from sporting activity. Even now, women athletes engage in sport only as a result of great courage, and still endure numerous problems.”
----------
Mansour from Germany offered his own unique perspective as a transgender Iranian, and came out in support of the ban of the women athletes, comparing the position of Iranian transgender athletes with their German counterparts:
I have to explain this from my own experiences, because I am transgender. When they are able, transsexual people start their hormone therapy, which causes some physical transformations, such as a change in their voice - the same thing happened to me. It also increases physical strength. So it is fair that they could not play in the women’s team. In Germany, one can only obtain a male ID after surgery and hormone therapy, and it is normal that the individual cannot join a women’s team. Even Germany’s athletics champion gave up sport after starting hormone therapy.
----------
As well as comments made during the airing of Nowbate Shoma, a number of Iranians left comments on the show’s Facebook page, discussing the issue.
A number of Facebook users appeared sympathetic to the plight of the athletes in question:
Zari: This ‘sexual ambiguity’ was not their fault - why should they be banned from doing something in which they are successful!?
Maryam: But these people are without sin, they are God’s creatures, and didn’t have any choice [in being who they are].
Sam: But what should these people do, who are not completely man or woman? With whom should they play and train?
----------
Others were less sympathetic, expressing themselves in terms that ranged from ignorant, through to overtly homophobic and transphobic:
Ehsan: “I think it is a good decision, since some of these two-sexed people have bodies like men, and even after surgery they still have male hormones in their bodies, and male strength. So they’d have advantages over women, which is unfair in sport!”
Mitra: “I am a coach and referee in futsal, and I’ve observed that the rate of queers is very high in these sports. I think it was a good decision [to ban the athletes].”
----------
More common, however, were comments that interpreted the Football Federation’s disqualification of these women as symptomatic of systemic and pervasive discrimination against women in sport, putting aside questions of targeted discrimination against transgender and intersex Iranians:
Nas: These are just crazy excuses. I was banned from playing in the League because of my short hair.
Shadi: In Iran [the government] sees no value in women’s sport, and now they use this excuse to make it easier to ban women.
Tuba: Shame on Iranian men, that women must play in this outfit [referring to the hijab], and are not allowed to go and watch the football games that they’d like. Now women are gradually being eliminated from the sport on the basis of ridiculous reasons, and men don’t bother to react. Shame on them.
----------
The Iranian Football Federation has since announced that gender tests are to be made mandatory for all women footballers at the national level, Hashemian stating that clubs have a responsibility to submit all new signings to gender tests before finalising any contracts.
Such a move will only serve to discourage young Iranian women from taking part in sport at a professional level, with transgender players, as well as women suffering from medical conditions such as androgen insensitivity syndrome particularly vulnerable to being hounded out of the world of professional women’s sport.
The problematic nature of these gender tests is still largely perceived in terms of the state’s hostility towards women’s sports in general, rather than as a targeted attack on transgender and intersex Iranians. Though it is impossible to assess the precise intent behind the Iranian Football Federation’s new policy, such regressive practices threaten the position of both women and sexual minorities in the world of Iranian professional sport, and should be challenged.
Though a number of Iranian commentators expressed explicit support for the affected athletes, there remains a great deal of work left to do in constructing a meaningful dialogue around the issues facing LGBTIQ sportspeople in Iran. The discussion provoked by Nowbate Shoma remains, however, an important first step.